Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Austin
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin

88.1%
5.9%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 78719 5.9% 37.6% (-31.7)#41 35.2% (-29.3)#1,366
2. 78739 9.0% 37.6% (-28.6)#119 35.2% (-26.2)#3,115
3. 78733 10.8% 37.6% (-26.8)#169 35.2% (-24.4)#4,362
4. 78737 11.3% 37.6% (-26.3)#184 35.2% (-23.9)#4,733
5. 78725 14.8% 37.6% (-22.8)#310 35.2% (-20.4)#7,801
6. 78734 18.0% 37.6% (-19.6)#469 35.2% (-17.2)#10,899
7. 78738 23.2% 37.6% (-14.4)#723 35.2% (-12.0)#15,872
8. 78747 27.3% 37.6% (-10.3)#920 35.2% (-7.92)#19,184
9. 78732 28.6% 37.6% (-9.00)#975 35.2% (-6.58)#20,150
10. 78736 29.5% 37.6% (-8.07)#1,009 35.2% (-5.65)#20,730
11. 78742 31.5% 37.6% (-6.12)#1,095 35.2% (-3.70)#21,941
12. 78746 33.2% 37.6% (-4.39)#1,152 35.2% (-1.97)#22,890
13. 78724 33.7% 37.6% (-3.92)#1,171 35.2% (-1.50)#23,114
14. 78730 35.1% 37.6% (-2.46)#1,227 35.2% (-0.043)#23,823
15. 78750 36.9% 37.6% (-0.671)#1,270 35.2% (+1.75)#24,582
16. 78749 37.0% 37.6% (-0.557)#1,273 35.2% (+1.86)#24,640
17. 78754 38.8% 37.6% (+1.15)#1,317 35.2% (+3.57)#25,294
18. 78757 41.0% 37.6% (+3.38)#1,369 35.2% (+5.80)#25,990
19. 78717 43.7% 37.6% (+6.15)#1,437 35.2% (+8.57)#26,716
20. 78748 44.4% 37.6% (+6.76)#1,448 35.2% (+9.18)#26,869
21. 78731 45.2% 37.6% (+7.58)#1,463 35.2% (+10.00)#27,089
22. 78744 49.2% 37.6% (+11.6)#1,540 35.2% (+14.1)#27,881
23. 78721 49.8% 37.6% (+12.2)#1,545 35.2% (+14.6)#27,971
24. 78703 49.9% 37.6% (+12.3)#1,548 35.2% (+14.7)#27,987
25. 78701 50.6% 37.6% (+13.0)#1,558 35.2% (+15.4)#28,106
26. 78723 51.4% 37.6% (+13.8)#1,571 35.2% (+16.2)#28,237
27. 78722 51.5% 37.6% (+13.9)#1,573 35.2% (+16.3)#28,258
28. 78745 52.0% 37.6% (+14.4)#1,577 35.2% (+16.8)#28,336
29. 78759 52.5% 37.6% (+14.9)#1,584 35.2% (+17.3)#28,398
30. 78735 53.7% 37.6% (+16.1)#1,599 35.2% (+18.5)#28,585
31. 78727 55.5% 37.6% (+17.9)#1,614 35.2% (+20.4)#28,845
32. 78756 55.8% 37.6% (+18.2)#1,616 35.2% (+20.6)#28,865
33. 78726 55.8% 37.6% (+18.2)#1,617 35.2% (+20.6)#28,867
34. 78729 57.7% 37.6% (+20.1)#1,628 35.2% (+22.6)#29,077
35. 78702 57.9% 37.6% (+20.3)#1,629 35.2% (+22.7)#29,090
36. 78753 66.4% 37.6% (+28.8)#1,689 35.2% (+31.2)#29,826
37. 78704 68.2% 37.6% (+30.6)#1,701 35.2% (+33.0)#29,940
38. 78728 72.2% 37.6% (+34.6)#1,718 35.2% (+37.0)#30,156
39. 78758 73.5% 37.6% (+35.9)#1,721 35.2% (+38.4)#30,215
40. 78751 78.0% 37.6% (+40.4)#1,735 35.2% (+42.8)#30,363
41. 78752 79.1% 37.6% (+41.5)#1,737 35.2% (+43.9)#30,402
42. 78741 81.5% 37.6% (+43.9)#1,744 35.2% (+46.3)#30,468
43. 78705 88.1% 37.6% (+50.5)#1,756 35.2% (+52.9)#30,593

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX are:
#1
5.9%
#2
9.0%
#3
10.8%
#4
11.3%
#5
14.8%
#6
18.0%
#7
23.2%
#8
27.3%
#9
28.6%
#10
29.5%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
78719 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX with 5.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin is 55.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.