Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Austin
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin

0.79%
50.4%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 78726 50.4% 27.2% (+23.2)#199 24.1% (+26.3)#3,297
2. 78702 44.4% 27.2% (+17.3)#281 24.1% (+20.4)#4,592
3. 78730 44.0% 27.2% (+16.9)#286 24.1% (+20.0)#4,670
4. 78741 40.7% 27.2% (+13.6)#355 24.1% (+16.7)#5,536
5. 78758 39.2% 27.2% (+12.0)#396 24.1% (+15.1)#6,034
6. 78717 32.5% 27.2% (+5.38)#550 24.1% (+8.46)#8,438
7. 78705 31.7% 27.2% (+4.50)#580 24.1% (+7.59)#8,805
8. 78744 30.1% 27.2% (+2.95)#631 24.1% (+6.04)#9,454
9. 78721 29.2% 27.2% (+2.06)#656 24.1% (+5.15)#9,907
10. 78724 29.2% 27.2% (+2.05)#657 24.1% (+5.14)#9,910
11. 78753 28.6% 27.2% (+1.44)#678 24.1% (+4.53)#10,200
12. 78729 28.1% 27.2% (+0.892)#696 24.1% (+3.98)#10,502
13. 78754 27.1% 27.2% (-0.072)#736 24.1% (+3.01)#11,014
14. 78752 26.4% 27.2% (-0.767)#767 24.1% (+2.32)#11,361
15. 78734 25.4% 27.2% (-1.81)#819 24.1% (+1.27)#11,926
16. 78723 25.1% 27.2% (-2.05)#827 24.1% (+1.03)#12,016
17. 78704 22.6% 27.2% (-4.61)#917 24.1% (-1.52)#13,516
18. 78756 20.8% 27.2% (-6.38)#975 24.1% (-3.30)#14,491
19. 78728 18.3% 27.2% (-8.89)#1,054 24.1% (-5.80)#15,918
20. 78748 16.8% 27.2% (-10.4)#1,098 24.1% (-7.28)#16,791
21. 78736 16.6% 27.2% (-10.6)#1,111 24.1% (-7.51)#16,989
22. 78746 14.6% 27.2% (-12.5)#1,176 24.1% (-9.45)#18,085
23. 78745 14.3% 27.2% (-12.8)#1,187 24.1% (-9.73)#18,216
24. 78737 11.8% 27.2% (-15.4)#1,261 24.1% (-12.3)#19,747
25. 78725 11.2% 27.2% (-16.0)#1,282 24.1% (-12.9)#20,080
26. 78757 11.1% 27.2% (-16.1)#1,287 24.1% (-13.0)#20,190
27. 78735 10.2% 27.2% (-17.0)#1,312 24.1% (-13.9)#20,647
28. 78727 10.0% 27.2% (-17.1)#1,316 24.1% (-14.0)#20,709
29. 78733 10.0% 27.2% (-17.2)#1,319 24.1% (-14.1)#20,769
30. 78731 9.7% 27.2% (-17.4)#1,326 24.1% (-14.4)#20,885
31. 78747 9.2% 27.2% (-17.9)#1,344 24.1% (-14.8)#21,141
32. 78751 7.9% 27.2% (-19.2)#1,375 24.1% (-16.2)#21,823
33. 78738 7.2% 27.2% (-20.0)#1,393 24.1% (-16.9)#22,170
34. 78732 6.5% 27.2% (-20.6)#1,410 24.1% (-17.6)#22,494
35. 78739 6.3% 27.2% (-20.9)#1,414 24.1% (-17.8)#22,608
36. 78703 5.8% 27.2% (-21.4)#1,425 24.1% (-18.3)#22,826
37. 78759 3.6% 27.2% (-23.6)#1,453 24.1% (-20.5)#23,587
38. 78750 0.79% 27.2% (-26.4)#1,478 24.1% (-23.3)#24,118

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX are:
#1
50.4%
#2
44.4%
#3
44.0%
#4
40.7%
#5
39.2%
#6
32.5%
#7
31.7%
#8
30.1%
#9
29.2%
#10
29.2%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX?
78726 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX with 50.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin, TX?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Austin is 23.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas is 27.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.