White/Caucasian vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Potawatomi
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Potawatomi
18.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,032,364 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 18.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,133,326 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 13.1% | 14.8% |
Maximum | 38.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.0% | 85.2% |
Mean | 19.9% | 38.4% |
Median | 18.5% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 25.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Potawatomi by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are African (18.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Hungarian (18.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Comanche (18.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Celtic (18.5%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Chippewa (18.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.1% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |