White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Male Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Immigrants from Northern Africa
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,582,417 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.885 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,989,271 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.30%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 31.3% | 47.8% |
| Range | 23.2% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 13.8% |
| Median | 13.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |