Ukrainian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ukrainians
Immigrants from Malaysia
19.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,822,135 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,207,874 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ukrainian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 16.8% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 32.5% |
Range | 83.2% | 27.5% |
Mean | 36.2% | 17.2% |
Median | 24.4% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.6% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Sierra Leonean (19.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from France (19.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Croatian (19.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Brazil (19.7%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Greek (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |