Scandinavian vs Polish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Polish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Scandinavians
Poles
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Polish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,652,874 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,484,152 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.12%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scandinavian | Polish |
Minimum | 4.8% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 44.4% |
Range | 95.2% | 43.4% |
Mean | 32.8% | 14.9% |
Median | 17.5% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.4% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Poles by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |