Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Immigrants from Jordan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Immigrants from Jordan
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
80.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,138,697 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,176,549 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 12.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.35% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 49.8% | 49.7% |
Range | 49.5% | 48.5% |
Mean | 16.1% | 17.7% |
Median | 15.0% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (17.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cambodia (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
Nepalese | 3.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.0% |
Inupiat | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Venezuela (15.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and French (15.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |