Shoshone vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Shoshone
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Shoshone
Czechoslovakians
20.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,129,328 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 352,316,526 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 18.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 7.7% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.8% | 96.4% |
Mean | 23.8% | 29.8% |
Median | 19.4% | 19.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.0% | 39.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 23.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Barbados (20.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cuba (19.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Fijian (19.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.8% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.9% |
Fijians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 20.0% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 20.0% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 20.1% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Syria (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Irish (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Venezuelan (16.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (16.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and English (16.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Canadians | 77.6 /100 | #151 | Good 16.7% |
Belgians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 16.7% |
Dutch | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 16.7% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 76.0 /100 | #154 | Good 16.7% |
South Americans | 75.1 /100 | #155 | Good 16.7% |
Afghans | 74.4 /100 | #156 | Good 16.8% |
Venezuelans | 73.7 /100 | #157 | Good 16.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 72.5 /100 | #158 | Good 16.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 72.3 /100 | #159 | Good 16.8% |
Irish | 72.0 /100 | #160 | Good 16.8% |
English | 70.4 /100 | #161 | Good 16.8% |
Costa Ricans | 69.8 /100 | #162 | Good 16.9% |
Scottish | 68.6 /100 | #163 | Good 16.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 67.6 /100 | #164 | Good 16.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 66.9 /100 | #165 | Good 16.9% |