Serbian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Zimbabwean
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Zimbabweans
11.2%
POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Zimbabwean Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,537,143 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,186,100 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.11%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 19.3% |
| Range | 22.8% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 9.1% |
| Median | 9.0% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Zimbabweans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Slovak (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and European (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), European (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Slovak (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ukrainians | 97.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Serbians | 97.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.3 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |