Panamanian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,422,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,979,017 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 0.30%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Panamanian	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	5.0%	10.9%
Maximum	75.3%	48.8%
Range	70.3%	37.9%
Mean	21.6%	21.1%
Median	19.2%	19.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.7%	15.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.4%	22.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.1%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.9%	7.9%

Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pennsylvania German (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Latin America (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Yugoslavian (19.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%