Mongolian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,569,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,064,863 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.96%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Mongolian	Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Minimum	2.2%	0.84%
Maximum	43.5%	38.4%
Range	41.3%	37.6%
Mean	14.9%	12.2%
Median	12.7%	11.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.8%	8.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.7%	14.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.9%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.0%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.9%	6.6%

Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Kuwait (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Romanian (12.8%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Pakistani (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Hungary (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Brazil	93.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 12.8%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 12.8%
Mongolians	93.0 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	93.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 12.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 12.8%
Romanians	92.8 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	92.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 12.8%
Slovenes	92.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	91.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	91.2 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 12.9%
Czechs	90.3 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 12.9%
Syrians	90.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| North America	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 12.9%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	89.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 12.9%
Pakistanis	88.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 13.0%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.3 /100 \| #132	Excellent 13.0%
Serbians	87.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 13.0%
Afghans	85.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 13.0%