Lithuanian vs Cypriot Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Cypriot
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Cypriots
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,719,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,850,194 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 3.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Cypriot |
| Minimum | 0.071% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 24.8% |
| Range | 29.5% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 8.7% |
| Median | 9.2% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Cypriots by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Iranian (10.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |