Liberian vs Nepalese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Nepalese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Nepalese
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Nepalese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
![Liberian vs Nepalese Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/liberians-vs-nepalese-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Nepalese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 31.6% |
Range | 43.6% | 26.5% |
Mean | 15.7% | 16.0% |
Median | 14.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Nepalese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |