Immigrants from Jamaica vs Nepalese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Nepalese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Nepalese
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Nepalese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Nepalese |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 50.6% | 31.6% |
| Range | 45.1% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 16.0% |
| Median | 15.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Nepalese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |