Laotian vs Immigrants from Philippines Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,108,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,906,754 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.040%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Laotian	Immigrants from Philippines
Minimum	0.40%	3.6%
Maximum	90.3%	52.9%
Range	89.9%	49.4%
Mean	18.2%	14.9%
Median	13.4%	12.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.1%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.5%	15.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.4%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.7%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.5%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Philippines by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%