Japanese vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Japanese
Ugandan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Japanese
Ugandans
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
17.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,332,708 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,523,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Ugandan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 51.6% |
Range | 99.0% | 49.5% |
Mean | 23.2% | 17.1% |
Median | 20.5% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.8% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Ugandans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Iraqi (17.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (17.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |