Italian vs Immigrants from Sweden Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,598,010 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Italian	Immigrants from Sweden
Minimum	2.0%	3.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	98.0%	96.1%
Mean	14.4%	21.6%
Median	10.7%	12.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.9%	10.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	25.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.1%	15.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.8%	23.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.7%	22.4%

Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Sweden by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.2%
Greeks	99.2 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Israel	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%