Italian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,355,214 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 2.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Italian	Immigrants from Netherlands
Minimum	2.0%	1.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	98.0%	99.0%
Mean	14.4%	18.8%
Median	10.7%	13.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.9%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	19.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.1%	9.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.8%	18.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.7%	18.2%

Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Netherlands by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%