Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Ugandan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Ugandans
13.3%
POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,935,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,996,476 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Ugandan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 71.4% | 27.1% |
Range | 69.4% | 26.5% |
Mean | 18.3% | 12.9% |
Median | 16.1% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 16.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |