Immigrants from Portugal vs German Russian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,490,007 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,990,905 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 0.060%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Portugal	German Russian
Minimum	2.3%	4.7%
Maximum	43.4%	84.6%
Range	41.1%	79.9%
Mean	17.9%	19.5%
Median	16.6%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.4%	12.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.3%	20.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.9%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.4%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	15.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Portugal and German Russians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Portugal are Ugandan (17.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to German Russians are Ugandan (17.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.3%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Spanish	20.8 /100 \| #195	Fair 17.0%
Spaniards	20.5 /100 \| #196	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	20.1 /100 \| #197	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	19.0 /100 \| #198	Poor 17.1%
Delaware	18.8 /100 \| #199	Poor 17.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	16.9 /100 \| #200	Poor 17.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	13.7 /100 \| #201	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	13.4 /100 \| #202	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	13.3 /100 \| #203	Poor 17.3%
Ugandans	12.5 /100 \| #204	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Portugal	11.2 /100 \| #205	Poor 17.4%
German Russians	10.9 /100 \| #206	Poor 17.4%
Immigrants \| Thailand	8.2 /100 \| #207	Tragic 17.5%
Malaysians	7.6 /100 \| #208	Tragic 17.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	7.3 /100 \| #209	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Armenia	6.8 /100 \| #210	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	6.7 /100 \| #211	Tragic 17.6%
Aleuts	6.6 /100 \| #212	Tragic 17.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	6.0 /100 \| #213	Tragic 17.7%
Panamanians	5.9 /100 \| #214	Tragic 17.7%
Osage	5.8 /100 \| #215	Tragic 17.7%