Immigrants from Philippines vs Australian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,147,188 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,609,541 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Australian
Minimum	1.4%	4.9%
Maximum	49.1%	61.8%
Range	47.7%	56.9%
Mean	13.3%	19.4%
Median	12.7%	15.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.9%	12.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.4%	23.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	12.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Australians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%), European (14.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Romania (14.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Europe (14.2%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (14.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Russia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Swiss (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Macedonian (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.2%
Zimbabweans	98.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.3 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.2 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.3%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.3%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.3%
Laotians	98.0 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.3%
Cambodians	97.8 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.4%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.4%
Ukrainians	97.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	97.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.4%
Australians	97.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.5%
Swiss	97.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	97.2 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 14.5%
Finns	97.2 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 14.5%