Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Bulgarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Bulgarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Bulgarians
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Bulgarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,287,962 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.355 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.25% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 53.6% |
Range | 19.7% | 53.3% |
Mean | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Median | 9.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Bulgarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |