Immigrants from Morocco vs Pakistani Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Pakistani
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Pakistanis
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Pakistani Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,779,990 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,803,446 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 43.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.6% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 31.6% |
| Median | 18.9% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 36.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco and Pakistanis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |