Immigrants from Jamaica vs Brazilian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,183,759 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,615,772 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.6%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jamaica	Brazilian
Minimum	1.3%	1.3%
Maximum	100.0%	73.5%
Range	98.7%	72.2%
Mean	19.0%	18.2%
Median	17.4%	17.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.0%	11.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.4%	21.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.7%	10.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.6%	10.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Brazilians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Iraq (18.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Burmese (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (18.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Korea (18.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (18.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Haiti (18.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Armenian (18.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Korea	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 18.6%
Brazilians	99.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 18.7%
Immigrants \| Haiti	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 18.7%
Armenians	99.7 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 18.7%
Lithuanians	99.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 18.7%
Hawaiians	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 18.7%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 18.8%
Costa Ricans	99.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 18.8%
Uruguayans	99.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 18.8%
Palestinians	99.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 18.8%
Japanese	99.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 18.9%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 18.9%