Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Bulgarian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,205,190 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 6.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Bulgarian
Minimum	0.58%	0.87%
Maximum	23.8%	46.7%
Range	23.2%	45.8%
Mean	10.2%	12.7%
Median	9.5%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	7.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.8%	16.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	8.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.1%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.1%	7.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Bulgarians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 11.0%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 11.3%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 11.4%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 11.5%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 12.3%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 12.3%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 12.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 12.7%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 12.9%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 13.0%
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%