Immigrants from England vs Latvian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 380,023,183 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,394,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.040%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from England	Latvian
Minimum	2.2%	0.67%
Maximum	100.0%	66.7%
Range	97.8%	66.0%
Mean	37.3%	21.5%
Median	28.1%	19.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	20.3%	15.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.2%	23.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	18.0%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	29.0%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	28.3%	13.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Latvians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Slovak (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Slovak (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 19.4%
Guyanese	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 19.4%
Cambodians	94.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 19.4%
Paraguayans	94.6 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	94.3 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Panama	94.0 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Russia	93.7 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 19.4%
Cape Verdeans	93.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 19.4%
Slovaks	92.9 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| England	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.9 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 19.5%
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%