Immigrants from Albania vs Uruguayan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,372,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,820,486 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Albania	Uruguayan
Minimum	2.7%	3.7%
Maximum	31.4%	66.7%
Range	28.7%	63.0%
Mean	14.2%	19.2%
Median	13.2%	14.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.9%	10.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.5%	18.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	16.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	15.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Albania and Uruguayans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Albania are Costa Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Tsimshian (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Chile	74.8 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	71.3 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	71.3 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	69.6 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	51.3 /100 \| #171	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Colombia	50.8 /100 \| #172	Average 16.4%
Tsimshian	50.5 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Uruguayans	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	49.0 /100 \| #175	Average 16.5%
Whites/Caucasians	48.2 /100 \| #176	Average 16.5%
Ethiopians	47.8 /100 \| #177	Average 16.5%
Scotch-Irish	47.5 /100 \| #178	Average 16.5%
Hungarians	47.3 /100 \| #179	Average 16.5%