Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,262,945 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,725,386 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Afghanistan	Alaskan Athabascan
Minimum	6.0%	2.1%
Maximum	48.0%	100.0%
Range	42.0%	97.9%
Mean	20.0%	36.2%
Median	16.0%	23.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.9%	14.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	27.6%	61.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.7%	46.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.6%	28.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.5%	28.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Cameroon (17.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Ugandan (17.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Hmong (17.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Panamanian (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Pennsylvania German (17.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from the Azores (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Uruguay	23.1 /100 \| #194	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Uganda	22.5 /100 \| #195	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	22.0 /100 \| #196	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Kenya	19.1 /100 \| #197	Poor 16.9%
Delaware	17.1 /100 \| #198	Poor 17.0%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	15.1 /100 \| #199	Poor 17.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	14.7 /100 \| #200	Poor 17.1%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	14.7 /100 \| #201	Poor 17.1%
Ugandans	14.3 /100 \| #202	Poor 17.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	14.2 /100 \| #203	Poor 17.1%
Hmong	14.0 /100 \| #204	Poor 17.1%
Aleuts	13.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 17.1%
Alaska Natives	11.8 /100 \| #206	Poor 17.2%
German Russians	8.6 /100 \| #207	Tragic 17.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	7.5 /100 \| #208	Tragic 17.4%
Panamanians	6.9 /100 \| #209	Tragic 17.5%
Alaskan Athabascans	6.9 /100 \| #210	Tragic 17.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	6.6 /100 \| #211	Tragic 17.5%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	6.5 /100 \| #212	Tragic 17.5%
Immigrants \| Azores	6.2 /100 \| #213	Tragic 17.5%
Iraqis	5.9 /100 \| #214	Tragic 17.5%