English vs Immigrants from Vietnam Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,516,168 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 399,274,796 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.42%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	English	Immigrants from Vietnam
Minimum	4.3%	2.0%
Maximum	100.0%	31.4%
Range	95.7%	29.4%
Mean	25.5%	14.6%
Median	16.4%	14.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.4%	12.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	28.2%	17.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.8%	5.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.3%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.2%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to English and Immigrants from Vietnam by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	95.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Dutch	95.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.0%
Serbians	95.2 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Jordanians	95.1 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| England	94.8 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Pakistanis	94.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%
English	94.3 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	94.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.2%
Basques	93.8 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.2%
Irish	93.8 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	93.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Armenians	93.6 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	93.5 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	93.5 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%
Native Hawaiians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.2%
South Africans	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.2%
Scottish	93.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%