Ecuadorian vs Slovene Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Slovene
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Slovenes
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
85.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Slovene Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,561,230 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,782,721 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 4.2%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e39c/4e39c8fdad7f4e14433eb72cab783e991e645465" alt="Ecuadorian vs Slovene Single Male Poverty"
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Slovene |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 27.8% | 46.9% |
Range | 26.3% | 45.6% |
Mean | 12.3% | 17.3% |
Median | 12.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 26.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 12.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Netherlands (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 26.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.0% |
Liberians | 25.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | England | 23.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |