Ecuadorian vs Nepalese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Nepalese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Nepalese
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Nepalese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,275,748 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,511,115 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Nepalese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 46.8% | 64.2% |
| Range | 44.9% | 61.7% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 20.5% |
| Median | 17.3% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Nepalese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and American (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |