Brazilian vs Belgian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Brazilian
Belgian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Brazilians
Belgians
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Belgian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,856,218 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,783,790 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Belgian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 29.6% |
Range | 54.0% | 28.6% |
Mean | 16.6% | 11.2% |
Median | 14.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Belgians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |