Ute vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
 Kiowa
 In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Ute
Kiowa
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,097,526 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 81.6%, a difference of 0.97%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Kiowa | 
| Minimum | 16.2% | 55.6% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 83.8% | 44.4% | 
| Mean | 79.2% | 81.6% | 
| Median | 81.7% | 81.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 73.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 88.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 15.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 11.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 10.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Ute and Kiowa by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Shoshone (81.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaska Native (81.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 82.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 82.0%  | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 81.7%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 81.6%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 81.6%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 81.6%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 81.6%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 81.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 81.1%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 81.0%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.8%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 80.6%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 80.3%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.8%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.3%  |