Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,837,645 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 40.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,804,758 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 41.8%, a difference of 3.2%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tlingit-Haida	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Minimum	6.4%	19.7%
Maximum	90.3%	75.0%
Range	83.9%	55.3%
Mean	48.8%	46.4%
Median	47.3%	44.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	34.8%	41.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	61.5%	53.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	26.7%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.5%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	20.2%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Kenya (40.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Laos (40.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Zaire (40.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Indonesian (40.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Cree (40.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Yugoslavian (41.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (41.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (41.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Scotch-Irish (41.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 41.8%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 41.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 41.7%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 41.7%
Sioux	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 41.5%
Scotch-Irish	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 41.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 41.5%
Celtics	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 41.3%
Whites/Caucasians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 41.3%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 41.2%
Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 41.1%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 41.1%
Immigrants \| Sudan	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 41.0%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 40.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 40.8%
Cree	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 40.8%
Indonesians	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 40.7%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 40.7%
Immigrants \| Laos	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 40.6%
Immigrants \| Kenya	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 40.5%
Tlingit-Haida	100.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 40.5%