Navajo vs Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Navajo
Czechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Navajo
Czechoslovakians
73.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,798,006 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 73.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,545,873 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 84.6%, a difference of 14.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 31.8% | 55.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.2% | 44.5% |
| Mean | 69.5% | 85.2% |
| Median | 70.2% | 85.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.7% | 80.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.1% | 93.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Navajo by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (74.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zaire (84.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (84.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 84.7% |
| Austrians | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 84.7% |
| Argentineans | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 88.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Afghans | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 82.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 81.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 80.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 80.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 79.4 /100 | #144 | Good 84.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 79.4 /100 | #145 | Good 84.6% |