Lumbee vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Lumbee
Yuman
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Lumbee
Yuman
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,461 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 77.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,678,210 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 77.1%, a difference of 0.23%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Yuman |
Minimum | 42.1% | 48.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.9% | 51.4% |
Mean | 80.3% | 73.6% |
Median | 79.4% | 72.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.2% | 60.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.5% | 84.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.2% | 24.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Yuman by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Ute (78.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.84%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Ute (78.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |