Irish vs South American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Irish
South American Indian
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Irish
South American Indians
42.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
35.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
14.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs South American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,711,118 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 42.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,452,175 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 35.8%, a difference of 17.4%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Irish | South American Indian |
Minimum | 13.8% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 86.2% | 90.0% |
Mean | 54.4% | 42.8% |
Median | 44.6% | 35.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.0% | 29.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 27.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.9% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 21.1% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Irish by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Scottish (42.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (41.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Liberian (41.8%, a difference of 0.34%), French (42.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Polish (42.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Bangladeshis | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 42.5% |
German Russians | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 42.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 42.4% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 42.3% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 42.1% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 42.1% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 42.0% |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 42.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 41.9% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 41.8% |
Yugoslavians | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 41.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 41.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 41.7% |
Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 41.5% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Chilean (35.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (35.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Albania (35.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (35.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (35.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 19.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 35.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 19.8 /100 | #199 | Poor 35.9% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 35.9% |
Alsatians | 17.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 35.9% |
Senegalese | 17.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 35.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 16.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 35.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 15.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 35.8% |
South American Indians | 14.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 35.8% |
Chileans | 14.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 35.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 14.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 35.8% |
Koreans | 13.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 35.7% |
Moroccans | 12.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 35.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 11.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 35.6% |
Mexicans | 11.9 /100 | #211 | Poor 35.6% |
Houma | 11.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 35.6% |