Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Italian In Labor Force | Age 30-34

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,680,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,629,236 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Italian
Minimum	67.7%	55.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	32.3%	44.4%
Mean	86.1%	89.4%
Median	85.9%	87.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.2%	85.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.4%	92.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.9%	6.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Italians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Lithuanian (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Soviet Union (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Brazil (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Poland (85.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 85.6%
Croatians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.6%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.8 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.6%
Cape Verdeans	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.6%
Filipinos	99.6 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.6 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.6 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 85.5%
Czechs	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 85.5%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.5%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| France	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 85.5%
Soviet Union	99.4 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 85.5%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 85.5%
Italians	99.4 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 85.4%