Immigrants from Latvia vs Palestinian In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,735,345 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,468,318 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 80.0%, a difference of 0.10%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latvia	Palestinian
Minimum	31.8%	57.1%
Maximum	100.0%	90.0%
Range	68.2%	32.9%
Mean	78.9%	78.9%
Median	81.3%	79.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	78.9%	76.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	84.2%	81.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.6%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Palestinians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Colombian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Croatian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Filipino (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Immigrants \| Japan	97.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 80.1%
Colombians	97.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 80.1%
Jordanians	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.1 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 80.1%
Croatians	97.1 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 80.1%
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	96.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 80.1%
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%