Immigrants from Chile vs Palestinian In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,647,266 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.452 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,468,318 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 80.0%, a difference of 0.010%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Palestinian
Minimum	55.6%	57.1%
Maximum	94.1%	90.0%
Range	38.5%	32.9%
Mean	77.9%	78.9%
Median	79.7%	79.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	76.4%	76.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	81.5%	81.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.2%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Palestinians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), South American (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Filipino (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Filipino (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Venezuelan (80.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%
Russians	95.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 80.0%
Venezuelans	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Ghana	95.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 80.0%
Greeks	94.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Jordan	94.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 80.0%
Iranians	94.3 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	94.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 80.0%
Estonians	94.0 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 80.0%