Immigrants from Guatemala vs Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,275,426 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,569,412 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Guatemala	Guatemalan
Minimum	41.6%	44.5%
Maximum	81.9%	83.5%
Range	40.3%	39.0%
Mean	64.0%	64.4%
Median	65.1%	65.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	61.2%	61.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.4%	67.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.8%	6.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Guatemalans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	95.9 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Iraq	95.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 65.7%
Iraqis	95.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 65.7%
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%