Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from England In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,811,723 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 38.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,103,684 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 38.1%, a difference of 0.38%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from England
Minimum	10.0%	27.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	90.0%	72.6%
Mean	51.0%	48.6%
Median	41.4%	42.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.5%	37.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.3%	51.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	29.8%	14.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	24.8%	18.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	24.4%	18.1%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from England by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Ethiopian (38.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (38.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (38.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Chickasaw (38.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Seminole (38.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (38.0%, a difference of 0.10%), African (38.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Choctaw (38.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 38.3%
Ukrainians	97.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 38.3%
Ethiopians	97.4 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 38.2%
Guamanians/Chamorros	97.4 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 38.2%
Seminole	96.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| England	96.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 38.0%
Africans	95.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 38.0%
Choctaw	95.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 38.0%
New Zealanders	95.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 38.0%
Spaniards	95.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	95.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	95.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 37.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	94.7 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 37.9%
Cheyenne	94.6 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 37.9%