French vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
French
Immigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
French
Immigrants from China
63.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
French vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,429,642 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,121,912 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715 and weighted average of 65.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | French | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 29.1% | 28.6% |
Maximum | 95.3% | 85.0% |
Range | 66.2% | 56.4% |
Mean | 58.9% | 63.0% |
Median | 61.1% | 64.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.2% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.3% | 66.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to French by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Germany (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovak (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (64.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Austria (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Scottish (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 64.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.3 /100 | #278 | Tragic 64.0% |
Welsh | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 64.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 64.0% |
French Canadians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 64.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.2 /100 | #282 | Tragic 64.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 63.9% |
French | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 63.9% |
Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 63.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 63.9% |
Scottish | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 63.9% |
Spanish | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 63.9% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 63.8% |
Hungarians | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic 63.8% |
Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 63.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |