Eastern European vs Immigrants from Hong Kong In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,005,621 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552 and weighted average of 85.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,913,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Eastern European	Immigrants from Hong Kong
Minimum	65.7%	60.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	34.3%	40.0%
Mean	90.6%	85.8%
Median	88.3%	85.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.4%	83.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	100.0%	87.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.6%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.4%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	6.0%

Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Immigrants from Hong Kong by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Poland (85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Kenyan (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Macedonian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Cypriot (85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), German Russian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| India	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 85.3%
Ugandans	99.9 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 85.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.9 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 85.3%
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 85.3%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.8 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 85.2%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.8 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 85.2%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.8 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 85.2%
Macedonians	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 85.2%
Poles	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 85.2%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 85.2%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 85.2%
German Russians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.2%
Croatians	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.2%
Thais	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.6 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.1%