Chilean vs Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chilean
Egyptian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Chileans
Egyptians
84.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,599,929 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 84.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,798,546 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Egyptian |
Minimum | 61.0% | 67.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.0% | 32.5% |
Mean | 86.4% | 86.5% |
Median | 85.2% | 85.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.5% | 84.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.5% | 87.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Western Africa (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Filipino (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Ukrainian (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Kuwait (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (84.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Cubans | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Egyptians | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Haitians | 96.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Australia | 95.5 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 95.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 84.8% |
South Americans | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 94.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants | Russia | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Filipinos | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 84.7% |
Ukrainians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 84.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 84.7% |
Uruguayans | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 84.7% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 84.7% |
Bahamians | 93.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 84.7% |