Central American vs Slavic Householder Income Over 65 years
COMPARE
Central American
Slavic
Householder Income Over 65 years
Householder Income Over 65 years Comparison
Central Americans
Slavs
$56,321
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$61,709
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Slavic Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,593,998 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006 and weighted average of $56,321. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,416,943 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of $61,709, a difference of 9.6%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Slavic |
Minimum | $13,371 | $29,063 |
Maximum | $83,405 | $136,135 |
Range | $70,034 | $107,072 |
Mean | $55,234 | $62,217 |
Median | $55,069 | $59,730 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $49,853 | $42,874 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $60,940 | $73,140 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $11,087 | $30,267 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $12,548 | $24,786 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $12,479 | $24,526 |
Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Uzbekistan ($56,331, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong ($56,339, a difference of 0.030%), Guyanese ($56,351, a difference of 0.050%), Yakama ($56,234, a difference of 0.15%), and Yaqui ($56,417, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic $56,722 |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.0 /100 | #240 | Tragic $56,615 |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic $56,495 |
Yaqui | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic $56,417 |
Guyanese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic $56,351 |
Hmong | 0.8 /100 | #244 | Tragic $56,339 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic $56,331 |
Central Americans | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic $56,321 |
Yakama | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic $56,234 |
Vietnamese | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic $56,143 |
Mexican American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic $56,089 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic $55,986 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic $55,924 |
Osage | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic $55,677 |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic $55,598 |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Scottish ($61,735, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian ($61,673, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian ($61,656, a difference of 0.090%), Costa Rican ($61,638, a difference of 0.12%), and Alsatian ($61,797, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Immigrants | Belarus | 77.8 /100 | #143 | Good $62,162 |
Immigrants | Peru | 74.4 /100 | #144 | Good $61,988 |
Immigrants | Uganda | 74.2 /100 | #145 | Good $61,976 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 72.7 /100 | #146 | Good $61,902 |
Immigrants | Nepal | 71.4 /100 | #147 | Good $61,843 |
Alsatians | 70.5 /100 | #148 | Good $61,797 |
Scottish | 69.1 /100 | #149 | Good $61,735 |
Slavs | 68.5 /100 | #150 | Good $61,709 |
Hungarians | 67.7 /100 | #151 | Good $61,673 |
Armenians | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good $61,656 |
Costa Ricans | 66.9 /100 | #153 | Good $61,638 |
Swiss | 66.5 /100 | #154 | Good $61,621 |
Poles | 65.9 /100 | #155 | Good $61,598 |
Scandinavians | 65.6 /100 | #156 | Good $61,586 |
Macedonians | 65.1 /100 | #157 | Good $61,564 |