Welsh vs Czechoslovakian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Welsh
Czechoslovakian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Welsh
Czechoslovakians
27.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Czechoslovakian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,895,960 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,397,226 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.47%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 61.8% | 58.5% |
| Range | 58.0% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 23.5% |
| Median | 25.8% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.9% | 27.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Czechoslovakians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Ukraine (27.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (27.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), African (27.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tsimshian (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Pima (27.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
| Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
| Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
| Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
| Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
| Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
| Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
| New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |