Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Father Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,763,381 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,756,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.90%.

Single Father Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Trinidadian and Tobagonian	Immigrants from Jordan
Minimum	0.89%	0.21%
Maximum	5.0%	9.5%
Range	4.2%	9.3%
Mean	2.3%	2.3%
Median	2.2%	2.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.8%	1.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	2.5%	2.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.69%	1.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.92%	1.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.91%	1.3%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Immigrants from Jordan by Single Father Households

In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Australian (2.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Hungarian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Polish (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Serbian (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from England (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Father Households
Immigrants \| Barbados	98.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.1 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 2.2%
Hungarians	97.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Morocco	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 2.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 2.2%
Australians	97.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Brazil	97.7 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Iraq	97.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Yemen	97.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 2.2%
British West Indians	97.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	97.4 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 2.2%
Moroccans	96.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 2.2%
Jordanians	96.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| England	96.8 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 2.2%
Serbians	96.8 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Chile	96.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 2.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.6 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 2.2%
Poles	96.5 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 2.2%
Taiwanese	96.3 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 2.2%
Zimbabweans	95.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 2.2%
Syrians	94.8 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 2.2%