Panamanian vs Palestinian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Panamanian
Palestinian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Panamanians
Palestinians
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Palestinian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,372,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.41%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Palestinian |
Minimum | 4.6% | 13.1% |
Maximum | 49.6% | 57.1% |
Range | 45.0% | 44.1% |
Mean | 24.4% | 28.4% |
Median | 25.4% | 27.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.4% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Palestinians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |