Palestinian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,372,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,016,323 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 27.8%, a difference of 0.94%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Palestinian	Immigrants from Northern Africa
Minimum	13.1%	8.9%
Maximum	57.1%	49.2%
Range	44.1%	40.3%
Mean	28.4%	28.0%
Median	27.6%	27.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.9%	24.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	31.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.6%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.6%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (27.9%, a difference of 0.14%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%